Wood or aluminum substructure

CONSULTATION » DECKING » Wood or Aluminum

Substructure: wood or aluminum?

Which is more suitable for terrace construction? In most cases, the answer is wood – because the risk of screws breaking off is very high with aluminum. Depending on the project and priorities, however, some of the disadvantages of aluminum can be compensated for with the right accessories.

Comparison of wood vs. aluminum

In the following overview, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of wood and aluminum as a substructure. Below you can read a detailed evaluation of the properties in relation to terrace construction.

Cumaru substructure

from BioMaderas

Wingspan:

up to 200cm

Lifespan:

at least 25 years

Delay:

max. 1 %

Environmental balance:

very good

Aluminum substructure

from BioMaderas

Wingspan:

110cm

Lifespan:

practically indestructible

Delay:

max. 0,1 %

Environmental balance:

bad

Aluminum substructure

The prerequisite for a good aluminum substructure is a wall thickness of at least 2 mm and a design with a double web so that the screw sits in two layers of aluminum. Our aluminum substructure meets both requirements.

Advantages of an aluminum substructure: It is very straight and practically indestructible. Dimensional accuracy can simplify the construction of a terrace. However, the fact that the substructure lasts longer than the top layer is only an apparent advantage. This is because aluminum often cannot be used for the second terrace, as drill holes are already present.

Disadvantage of the aluminum substructure: The material is inflexible. When working with the wooden decking boards can therefore lead to stresses that cannot be absorbed by the aluminum. This can ultimately lead to the screw cracking. In the case of a visible screw connection, however, a spacer profile be installed to prevent the decking screw from cracking due to a shear area. decking screw through a shearing area. The BioMaderas clips are designed in such a way that the risk is already significantly reduced. Nevertheless, we recommend a construction method with a wooden substructure.

Wooden substructure

Prerequisite for a good wooden substructure: The type of wood used for the substructure should be at least as durable as the decking. Manual sorting should be carried out in advance so that unworkable timber with excessive warping is sorted out. Both requirements are met by our wooden substructures.

Advantage of the timber substructure: A timber-timber construction fits together better. There is no metallic squeaking and creaking, less tension builds up and tearing of the screw heads is prevented. In addition, a wooden substructure made of a dense material achieves a large span and saves on support points and pedestals.

Disadvantage of the wooden substructure: Wood is never as straight as aluminum. However, slight warping can usually be compensated for by screwing the structural timber to the boards.

Teak decking boards 95mm, Switzerland

Our accessories for the substructure